Submit a ticketCall us

Training ClassThe Orion® Platform Instructor-led Classes

Provided by SolarWinds® Academy, these trainings will introduce users to the Orion Platform and its features, management, and navigation. These courses are suitable for users looking to discover new tips, tricks, and ways to adapt their Orion products to better suit their monitoring needs:
Deploying the Orion Platform
Configuring Orion views, maps, and accounts
Configuring Orion alerts and reports

Reserve your seat.

Home > Success Center > Netflow Traffic Analyzer (NTA) > NTA - Knowledgebase Articles > Are there any differences in the way CBQoS data are handled

Are there any differences in the way CBQoS data are handled

Table of contents

Updated January 12, 2017

Overview

Are there any differences in the way CBQoS data are handled?

 

Environment

  • NTA 4.x

Detail

There is no fundamental change in the way CBQoS data is handled, between 3.x and 4.x: In both, the default polling period is 300 sec, and the CBQoS data are retained for the configured retention period.

 

The difference is in the displaying, because NTA 3.x was aggregating the CBQoS data consistently with the Flow data, in order to provide chart consistency. In NTA 4.x, the CBQoS aggregation has been removed in order to show as-polled data. It will therefore show more granular data than 3.x, even if the polling and retention period remains the same as in 3.x (no database sizing difference due to CBQoS between 3.x and 4.x).

 

 

 

Last modified

Tags

Classifications

Public