Submit a ticketCall us

Have You Auto Renewed? If not, you're missing out.
The SolarWinds Renewal Program comes with a host of benefits including the most recent product updates, 24/7 technical support, virtual instructor-led training and more. Experience all of this with the convenience of Auto Renewal, and never worry about missing any of these great benefits. Learn More.

Home > Success Center > Netflow Traffic Analyzer (NTA) > Are there any differences in the way CBQoS data are handled

Are there any differences in the way CBQoS data are handled

Table of contents

Updated January 12, 2017

Overview

Are there any differences in the way CBQoS data are handled?

 

Environment

  • NTA 4.x

Detail

There is no fundamental change in the way CBQoS data is handled, between 3.x and 4.x: In both, the default polling period is 300 sec, and the CBQoS data are retained for the configured retention period.

 

The difference is in the displaying, because NTA 3.x was aggregating the CBQoS data consistently with the Flow data, in order to provide chart consistency. In NTA 4.x, the CBQoS aggregation has been removed in order to show as-polled data. It will therefore show more granular data than 3.x, even if the polling and retention period remains the same as in 3.x (no database sizing difference due to CBQoS between 3.x and 4.x).

 

 

 

Last modified

Tags

Classifications

Public